Trump Values Judicial Independence Only When It Benefits Him
His criticism of President Joe Biden’s proposed Supreme Court reform is hard to take seriously.
His criticism of President Joe Biden’s proposed Supreme Court reform is hard to take seriously.
Both had been dropped from the Inflation Reduction Act over concerns about the bill's cost and the amount of borrowing needed to pay for them.
We need not conjure "extreme hypotheticals" to understand the danger posed by an "energetic executive" who feels free to flout the law.
The Supreme Court's flawed decision largely ignores text and original meaning, and fails to resolve crucial issues.
By requiring "absolute" immunity for some "official acts" and "presumptive" immunity for others, the justices cast doubt on the viability of Donald Trump's election interference prosecution.
The decision also negates two counts of the federal indictment accusing Donald Trump of illegally interfering in the 2020 presidential election.
The former and possibly future president hopes voters will overlook his incoherence.
Plus: Taiwan's TikTok strategy, Open AI resignations, nicotine freedom, and more...
Total spending under Trump nearly doubled. New programs filled Washington with more bureaucrats.
Biden has not delivered on his promise to decriminalize marijuana.
Most of the justices seem skeptical of granting Donald Trump complete immunity from criminal prosecution for "official acts."
The Supreme Court will decide whether former presidents can avoid criminal prosecution by avoiding impeachment and removal.
The Supreme Court's interpretation of the statute also could affect two charges against Donald Trump.
Fight back through better information and discourse, not by empowering the government.
The former RNC chairwoman is in good company.
The former RNC chair's concession that Biden won "fair and square" did not save her from internal outrage at her support for Trump's stolen-election fantasy.
The newspaper portrays the constitutional challenge to the government's social media meddling as a conspiracy by Donald Trump's supporters.
The reversal of a landmark reform was driven by unrealistic expectations and unproven assertions.
Three justices who concurred in that judgment accuse the majority of trying to "insulate all alleged insurrectionists from future challenges" by going further than necessary.
There is nothing in the Constitution that prevents an inmate from winning the presidency.
Plus: Balkan begging, California corruption, Russian gravediggers, and more...
The Supreme Court snubbed Sidney Powell and a court orders Mike Lindell to pay up.
True the Vote told a Georgia court that it can't produce any evidence to support claims of widespread ballot fraud in Georgia.
Most of the justices are clearly inclined to reject a Colorado Supreme Court decision asserting that power under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
The appeals court says it "cannot accept that the office of the Presidency places its former occupants above the law for all time thereafter."
A critique of John Yoo and Robert Delahunty's suggestion that the Vice President has a role in counting electoral votes.
He is asking the justices to reject the Colorado Supreme Court's conclusion that he is disqualified from running for president.
On Douthat's reasoning, published in the NY Times, Confederate secession wasn't an insurrection either.
As one appeals court judge pointed out, Trump's defense could literally let a president get away with murder.
Plus: Migrant shelter stabbing, Hollywood doom, Cuban spies, and more...
"Insurrection" and "rebellion" should not be conflated. But the events of January 6 readily meet the criteria for both.
The year's highlights in blame shifting.
Ballots should be counted quickly and accurately.
His lawyers say no jury can ever consider charges based on his "official acts" as president, which include his efforts to reverse Joe Biden's election.
The Colorado Supreme Court's reasoning in deciding that Trump is constitutionally disqualified from running for president seems iffy.
The former Trump lawyer could have avoided a massive defamation verdict by presenting his "definitively clear" evidence of election fraud.
Ballots should be counted quickly and accurately.
The former Trump campaign lawyer re-upped his false claims about two Georgia election workers in the middle of a trial aimed at determining the damages he owes them.
The article makes the case for disqualification on moral and pragmatic grounds, as well as legal ones.
A D.C. Circuit judge says the government’s defense of the order gives short shrift to "the First Amendment’s vigorous protection of political speech."
The court ruled against Trump on his strongest arguments, but accepted a weak one.
The former White House chief of staff is one of several former Trump advisers who are cooperating with prosecutors.
Johnson is a relative newcomer to Congress who has never even chaired a committee, and he is a close ally of former President Donald Trump.
Plus: Greta Thunberg gets booted from Israeli schools, Spain gets even less serious about work, regulating skyline views, and more...
The election conspiracy theorist struck a deal that allows her to avoid prison by testifying for the prosecution.
District Attorney Fani Willis’ preferred weapon wasn’t designed to be used this way.
If false beliefs about legality exempt people from Section 3 disqualification, leading Confederates would have been exempt as well.