J.D. Vance Wants To Control You With Taxes
People making the same income should be paying the same level of taxes no matter how they choose to live their lives.
People making the same income should be paying the same level of taxes no matter how they choose to live their lives.
The ruling means it's not child neglect for a pregnant woman prescribed medical marijuana to use it. But some judges say it should be.
The party platform previously called for a constitutional amendment to protect unborn children. Now, it says abortion should be left to the states.
The obstacles to having more babies can't be moved by tax incentives or subsidized child care.
The obstacles to having more babies can't be moved by tax incentives or subsidized child care.
Evolutionary psychologist Diana Fleischman discusses IVF, artificial genetic selection, and her unique take on the Ethan Hawke/Uma Thurman movie, Gattaca.
It's the contraception mandate in reverse, with no exception for religious employers.
Did the Alabama legislature's response to a controversial state supreme court decision give a special interest special treatment?
Plus: Illegal homes in California, Erdogan's party does poorly in local elections, and more...
Plus: Vanderbilt activists' 911 call, Kevorkianniversary, MAID problems, and more...
After the Alabama Supreme Court ruled in February that frozen embryos were children, legislators scrambled to protect in vitro fertilization clinics.
Plus: Balkan begging, California corruption, Russian gravediggers, and more...
Despite the popular narrative, Millennials have dramatically more wealth than Gen Xers had at the same age, and incomes continue to grow with each new generation.
Two-thirds of Americans oppose the Alabama ruling that claims frozen embryos are equivalent to children.
The policy is a true budget buster and is ineffective in the long term.
State Supreme Court Chief Justice Tom Parker cited the Bible to explain why.
In vitro gametogenesi could allow same-sex couples, post-menopausal women, and couples experiencing infertility to have children.
Tim Carney discusses America's "baby bust" on the latest episode of Just Asking Questions.
But there were still 47,573 more births last year than there were in 2020.
The right and the left are pushing pro-natalist polices that have never worked and are deeply misguided.
Join Reason on YouTube Thursday at 1 p.m. Eastern for a discussion about the limits of population control with Elizabeth Nolan Brown and Scott Winship.
Politicians' go-to fixes like child tax credits and federal paid leave are known for creating disincentives to work without much impact on fertility.
Plus: Diminishing differences in regional attitudes, IRS begins monitoring small transactions, and more…
The policy has some bipartisan support, despite the fact that it has mostly been a failure since its inception.
All of these advances are in mice for now, but maybe these breakthroughs can one day be adapted as human therapies.
IVF at "significant risk"
"Synthetic wombs make having kids much faster, easier, cheaper, and more accessible."
The claim that men face ‘environmental emasculation’ via exposure to synthetic endocrine disruptors is debunked.
Politicians and the media are telling bogus stories about falling fertility rates, rising inequality, and lack of economic mobility.
Americans have a reputation for being cockeyed optimists, but we're suckers when it comes to "declension narratives" about the fallen state of our world.
Americans are freely choosing to have fewer children.
A new working paper argues that car seat laws are discouraging moms from having a third child.
The total fertility rate falls to its lowest level ever.
Negative population growth back in 1919 was largely the result of the Spanish flu pandemic
The global total fertility rate fell by more than half, from 5 births per woman in 1960 to 2.4 today. But don't panic!
He Jiankui's moral failings should not be used as an excuse to delay a technology that could prevent inheritable diseases.
A U.K. bioethicist makes the case for deploying CRISPR gene-editing to modify human embryos in the next two years.
The number of children that families choose to have is none of the government's business.
Is that kind of gene-editing unethical?
Sanity prevails (for now) in Alabama case that sparked national outrage.
Thanks to global expansion of reproductive freedom, actual population growth is likely to be less and peak around the middle this century
It would be deeply immoral to require parents to select for particular traits, but it is also wrong to deny them the chance to make life easier for their children.
A new international commission will consider the pros and cons of human genome editing.
Is the solution a "fertility dividend" that makes a portion of a person's Social Security benefit dependent on each of their offspring's earnings?
Flinging around such terms is not helpful and does not advance the debate.
If it's safe, then it's ethical. No need for a global moratorium.
Falling fertility means that folks now have increasing power to choose the number of children that they wish to have.