South Carolina Cops Target Out-of-State Drivers for Highway Robbery
No arrest necessary as South Carolina police hunt for cash
No arrest necessary as South Carolina police hunt for cash
A 21-month legal battle unveils the dark side of South Carolina's annual traffic crackdown.
The ruling is the second recent court decision that has curbed Detroit's aggressive vehicle forfeiture program.
The MAGA movement has suddenly discovered the evils of politicized prosecutions, inequities in the justice system, and fear of police abuse.
But Justice Neil Gorsuch's concurring opinion suggests the Court may curb asset forfeiture in the future.
The cars of two Alabama women were seized for more than a year before courts found they were innocent owners. The Supreme Court says they had no constitutional right to a preliminary hearing.
David Knott helps clients retrieve unclaimed property from the government. The state has made it considerably harder for him to do that.
Kansas had among the most lax civil asset forfeiture laws in the country, but a bill sent to the governor's desk would strengthen protections for property owners.
Dewonna Goodridge quickly discovered that Kansas civil asset forfeiture laws were stacked against her when sheriff's deputies seized her truck.
Amid fear of rising crime, let's take a careful and deliberate approach—lest innocent people lose their rights and property.
Plus: A listener asks if the editors have criteria for what constitutes a good law.
Unfortunately, Willis’s Fulton County includes assets seized from non-prosecutors in its budget.
Greg and Teresa Almond lost their house and livelihood over a misdemeanor drug crime. Sheriff's deputies never got a warrant to search their house.
A federal judge allowed a lawsuit against the officers to proceed, finding evidence of several constitutional violations.
"It's crazy to me that somebody can be pulled over and have their cash and truck taken for an alleged crime, get acquitted of that crime, but they still never get their property back," Stitt said.
"You've got to be able to demonstrate some level of legitimacy" the head of the National Sheriffs' Association says of carrying large amounts of cash.
On Thursday, a federal appeals court will hear about the FBI's "blatant scheme to circumvent" the Fourth Amendment.
Yet another reason to donate to Reason's annual webathon!
Wayne County was seizing cars and using its less-fortunate residents as piggy banks.
That prosecutors in the Hoosier State successfully denied people this due process is a reflection of how abusive civil forfeiture can be.
Without a prompt post-seizure hearing, people can lose their property for months or years even when they ultimately get it back.
The outrageous case has led to calls from Congress to pass legislation curbing civil asset forfeiture.
With subplots about bite mark evidence and asset forfeiture, it's a parade of shady cop practices.
An officer conducted the search of Prentiss Jackson's vehicle after claiming he could smell "a little bit of weed." It ultimately resulted in a lengthy prison term.
A federal circuit judge writes that Detroit's vehicle seizure scheme "is simply a money-making venture—one most often used to extort money from those who can least afford it."
The decision provides important protection for property rights, and features a powerful concurring opinion by prominent conservative Judge Amal Thapar.
Cristal Starling lost $8,000 after she missed one of several filing deadlines to contest the seizure of her money by police. A federal appeals court says she and others like her should be given more leeway.
Civil forfeiture is a highly unaccountable practice. The justices have the opportunity to make it a bit less so.
The FAIR Act would be a significant step forward. It just passed the House Judiciary Committee on a unanimous 26-0 vote.
The FAIR Act includes several substantial reforms that would make it harder to take property from innocent owners through civil forfeiture.
Police have a long history of using the real or imagined smell of marijuana to justify outrageous invasions.
Just about everybody agrees the practice is legalized theft, but cops and prosecutors oppose change.
The Brookside Police Department’s shakedown of travelers became a national news story and prompted federal lawsuits.
The Court will determine whether the Due Process Clause prevents the government from using asset forfeiture to seize property and hold it for many months without a timely hearing.
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear two consolidated cases by Alabama women whose cars were both seized for more than a year before courts found they were innocent owners.
'Digidog is out of the pound," New York City Mayor Eric Adams declared, not ominously.
Police detectives accused Jerry Johnson of being a drug trafficker and seized cash he says he intended to use to buy a semitruck at auction. He was never charged with a crime.
The Institute for Justice says Robert Reeves' First Amendment rights were violated when prosecutors filed and refiled baseless felony charges against him after he sued to get his car back.
One guy with gambling debts is a news story, but a formal policy of legalized theft is a national scandal.
Plus: What's going on with Iran's morality police? Two more days to give to Reason's 2022 webathon, and more...
Read some of our Top 10 stories from the past year!
California police seized more than $17,000 from Vera and Apollonia Ward and accused them of laundering drug money, all without charging them with a crime. The two sisters were trying to start a dog-breeding business.
Even in cases that hinged on the trustworthiness of demonstrably untrustworthy cops, people are still waiting to get their money back.
The Supreme Court's 2018 ruling in Timbs v. Indiana revived the Excessive Fines Clause. Now state courts have to come up with tests to determine what's excessive.
Judge Gary Klausner admits that the FBI probably hid their true motives in rifling through the contents of hundreds of safe deposit boxes, but says that's fine.