Lessons for the U.S. from Japan's Lost Decade
Facing an economic downturn in the 1990s, Japan racked up debt. America should not repeat that mistake.
Facing an economic downturn in the 1990s, Japan racked up debt. America should not repeat that mistake.
Should we blame Biden and the politicians applauding him for their unwillingness to address our looming fiscal disaster?
We asked delegates at the Republican National Convention whether a second Trump term would address America's debt problem.
Opening night of the Republican National Convention programmed a central issue with a Trumpian twist: "Make America Wealthy Again."
Although former President Donald Trump's deregulatory agenda would make some positive changes, it's simply not enough.
The U.S. has successfully navigated past debt challenges, notably in the 1990s. Policymakers can fix this if they find the will to do so.
The candidate who grasps the gravity of this situation and proposes concrete steps to address it will demonstrate the leadership our nation now desperately needs. The stakes couldn't be higher.
The candidate makes the case against the two-party system.
Plus: A listener asks if there are any libertarian solutions to rising obesity rates.
We could grow our way out of our debt burden if politicians would limit spending increases to just below America's average yearly economic growth. But they won't even do that.
But will the government ever face repercussions for its role in the Adderall shortage?
Reasonable options include gradually raising the minimum retirement age, adjusting benefits to reflect longer life expectancies, and implementing fair means-testing to ensure benefits flow where they're actually needed.
Why aren't politicians on both sides more worried than they seem to be?
Social Security is expected to hit insolvency in 2035, while the portion of Medicare that pays for hospital visits and other medical care will be insolvent by 2036.
Despite their informal nature, those norms have historically constrained U.S. fiscal policy. But they're eroding.
Neither presidential candidate is willing to back the reforms necessary to close the gap between revenue and benefits.
The government needs to cut back on spending—and on the promises to special interests that fuel the spending.
"I'm concerned about a Trump-Biden rematch," argues Riedl. "You have two presidents with two of the worst fiscal records of the past 100 years."
The reality raises questions about the kind of future we want to leave for the next generation.
That's bad news for Americans.
The Copenhagen Consensus has long championed a cost-benefit approach for addressing the world's most critical environmental problems.
In the last 50 years, when the budget process has been in place, Congress has managed only four times to pass a budget on time.
Entitlement reform has long been considered a third rail in American politics, but that perspective might be changing.
Those sounding the loudest alarms about possible shutdowns are largely silent when Congress ignores its own budgetary rules. All that seems to matter is that government is metaphorically funded.
Medicare's new price-setting process for drug purchases is better than its current one if the result is lower government spending.
It's not the first time that has happened, but there are key differences about what happened this year.
Since Congress won't cut spending, an independent commission may be the only way to rein in the debt.
America’s biggest fiscal challenge lies in the unchecked growth of federal health care and old-age entitlement programs.
The lack of oversight and the general absence of a long-term vision is creating inefficiency, waste, and red ink as far as the eye can see.
Since Congress designed and implemented the last budget process in 1974, only on four occasions have all of the appropriations bills for discretionary spending been passed on time.
Many politicians offer a simplified view of the world—one in which government interventions are all benefits and no costs. That couldn't be further from the truth.
At a minimum, the national debt should be smaller than the size of the economy. A committed president just might be able to deliver.
A new Congressional Budget Office report warns of "significant economic and financial consequences" caused by the federal government's reckless borrowing.
Letting third parties pay our bills pushes prices higher and limits our options.
Even taking all the money from every billionaire wouldn't cover our coming bankruptcy.
Why the businessman launched a long shot campaign for the presidency.
The longer we wait to address our debt, the more painful it will be.
We can't grow our way out of its ruinous economic impact. The only way forward is to cut spending.
In 10 years, the programs' funds will be insolvent. Over the next 30 years, they will run a $116 trillion shortfall.
The higher taxes on small businesses and entrepreneurs could slow growth. Less opportunity means more tribalism and division.
Plus: The editors recommend the best books for sparking interest in free market principles.
Handouts for tourist-trap museums will be part of the federal funding battleground in the next two years.
Biden is set to propose a new tax on unrealized investment gains and to quadruple a recently imposed tax on stock buybacks.
Krugman sees benefit cuts as "a choice" but believes that implementing a massive tax increase on American employers and workers would be "of course" no big deal.
As legislators refuse to act, benefits will be cut without any possibility of sheltering those seniors who are poor.
Plus: Age verification for social media, a bill to ban cannabis "gatherings," and more...
Plus: a listener question on prohibition and a lightning round on the editors' favorite Super Bowl moments