Lessons for the U.S. from Japan's Lost Decade
Facing an economic downturn in the 1990s, Japan racked up debt. America should not repeat that mistake.
Facing an economic downturn in the 1990s, Japan racked up debt. America should not repeat that mistake.
Although former President Donald Trump's deregulatory agenda would make some positive changes, it's simply not enough.
Which party can do the least to fix America's troubled old-age welfare system?
The U.S. has successfully navigated past debt challenges, notably in the 1990s. Policymakers can fix this if they find the will to do so.
The candidate who grasps the gravity of this situation and proposes concrete steps to address it will demonstrate the leadership our nation now desperately needs. The stakes couldn't be higher.
The candidate makes the case against the two-party system.
Plus: A listener asks if there are any libertarian solutions to rising obesity rates.
We could grow our way out of our debt burden if politicians would limit spending increases to just below America's average yearly economic growth. But they won't even do that.
Reasonable options include gradually raising the minimum retirement age, adjusting benefits to reflect longer life expectancies, and implementing fair means-testing to ensure benefits flow where they're actually needed.
Why aren't politicians on both sides more worried than they seem to be?
Social Security is expected to hit insolvency in 2035, while the portion of Medicare that pays for hospital visits and other medical care will be insolvent by 2036.
Neither presidential candidate is willing to back the reforms necessary to close the gap between revenue and benefits.
Plus: A listener asks about the absurdity of Social Security entitlements.
An obvious, tepid reform was greeted with shrill partisan screeching.
Raising the payroll tax cap could generate up to $1 trillion over 10 years, but Social Security faces a $2.8 trillion deficit.
The government needs to cut back on spending—and on the promises to special interests that fuel the spending.
The reality raises questions about the kind of future we want to leave for the next generation.
A decade ago, DeSantis was supporting real efforts at reforming Social Security. Now, he's refusing to even acknowledge the problem.
That's bad news for Americans.
Lawmakers can take small steps that are uncontroversial and bipartisan to jumpstart the fiscal stability process.
A fiscal commission might be a good idea, but it's also the ultimate expression of Congress' irresponsibility.
The Copenhagen Consensus has long championed a cost-benefit approach for addressing the world's most critical environmental problems.
This week's debate was the first signal that the party's next presidential nominee might actually understand the entitlement crisis.
In the last 50 years, when the budget process has been in place, Congress has managed only four times to pass a budget on time.
Entitlement reform has long been considered a third rail in American politics, but that perspective might be changing.
Over the last several years, they have worked nonstop to ease the tax burden of their high-income constituents.
Those sounding the loudest alarms about possible shutdowns are largely silent when Congress ignores its own budgetary rules. All that seems to matter is that government is metaphorically funded.
Until Congress is willing to acknowledge that it makes no sense to send monthly checks to wealthy seniors, everything else will be on the chopping block.
It's not the first time that has happened, but there are key differences about what happened this year.
Since Congress won't cut spending, an independent commission may be the only way to rein in the debt.
The lack of oversight and the general absence of a long-term vision is creating inefficiency, waste, and red ink as far as the eye can see.
Many politicians offer a simplified view of the world—one in which government interventions are all benefits and no costs. That couldn't be further from the truth.
At a minimum, the national debt should be smaller than the size of the economy. A committed president just might be able to deliver.
A new Congressional Budget Office report warns of "significant economic and financial consequences" caused by the federal government's reckless borrowing.
Projections of huge savings are making the rounds. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Even taking all the money from every billionaire wouldn't cover our coming bankruptcy.
Plus: A listener question cross-examines prior Reason Roundtable discussions surrounding immigration, economic growth, and birthrates.
The deal will freeze non-military discretionary spending this year and allow a 1 percent increase in 2024.
Social Security will become insolvent in the early 2030s if Congress does nothing.
We can't grow our way out of its ruinous economic impact. The only way forward is to cut spending.
In 2019, discretionary spending was $1.338 trillion—or some $320 billion less than what Republicans want that side of the budget to be.
In 10 years, the programs' funds will be insolvent. Over the next 30 years, they will run a $116 trillion shortfall.
New data from the program's trustees show that insolvency will hit a year sooner than previously expected, giving policy makers just a decade before automatic benefit cuts occur.
If Republicans refuse to gore their three sacred cows, a new CBO report shows that balancing the budget is literally impossible.
Plus: The editors recommend the best books for sparking interest in free market principles.
Biden is set to propose a new tax on unrealized investment gains and to quadruple a recently imposed tax on stock buybacks.
But it's exactly what they need to start talking about.