America Criminalizes Too Much and Punishes Too Much
When those on parole or probation are included, one out of every 47 adults is under “some form of correctional supervision.”
When those on parole or probation are included, one out of every 47 adults is under “some form of correctional supervision.”
The decision shows that the Supreme Court has forced judges who like gun control to respect the Second Amendment anyway.
The Supreme Court is not as “extreme” or divided as it may seem.
Nina Jankowicz finds out the truth may hurt, but it isn’t lawsuit bait.
"In short, 'cruel and unusual' is not the same as 'harmful and unfair,'" the court wrote.
A federal judge rejected the government’s excuses for banning home production of liquor.
Officers should have known that handcuffing a compliant 10-year-old is unnecessary, the court ruled.
A federal appeals court ruled that the government is not immune from a breach-of-contract lawsuit filed by foreign students duped into enrolling into a fake school run by ICE.
The 5th Circuit ruled that the agency violated the Administrative Procedure Act when it rejected applications from manufacturers of flavored nicotine e-liquids.
And the Supreme Court agrees to weigh in.
The doctrine makes it nearly impossible for victims of prosecutorial misconduct to get recourse.
Her concurrence is a reminder that the application of criminal law should not be infected by personal animus toward any given defendant.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor called the Supreme Court ruling in SEC v. Jarkesy "a power grab." She's right, but in the wrong way.
There is a great deal of panic surrounding the "extreme" nature of the current Court. But that is often not based in reality.
Paul Erlinger was sentenced to 15 years in prison based largely on a determination made by a judge—not a jury.
Chevron deference, a doctrine created by the Court in 1984, gives federal agencies wide latitude in interpreting the meaning of various laws. But the justices may overturn that.
The plaintiffs are challenging the state's widespread surveillance, which it collects through over 600 cameras.
The justice's benign comments set off a lengthy news cycle and have been treated as a scandal by some in the media. Why?
The transit authority was sued after rejecting an ad that directed viewers to go to a website "to find out about the faith of our founders."
The ACLU, another polarizing organization, was willing to defend the NRA in court. That should tell you that some things aren't partisan.
Justin Pulliam's arrest and lawsuit once again demand we ask if "real" journalists are entitled to a different set of rights.
The Sixth Amendment was originally seen as vital to preserving liberty. Yet it has been consistently watered down.
Judge Carlton Reeves ripped apart the legal doctrine in his latest decision on the matter.
Prosecutor Ralph Petty was also employed as a law clerk—by the same judges he argued before.
Mollie and Michael Slaybaugh are reportedly out over $70,000. The government says it is immune.
Christian McGhee is suing, arguing a North Carolina assistant principal infringed on his free speech rights.
The pledge, while mostly legally illiterate, offers a reminder of the former president's outlook on government accountability.
David Knott helps clients retrieve unclaimed property from the government. The state has made it considerably harder for him to do that.
How the Backpage prosecution helped create a playbook for suppressing online speech, debanking disfavored groups, and using "conspiracy" charges to imprison the government's targets
The court found insufficient evidence to sustain 53 of 84 remaining counts against Lacey.
The little-known but outrageous practice allowed judges to enhance defendants' sentences using conduct a jury acquitted them of.
Michael Garrett and other Texas inmates get less than four hours of sleep a night. He argues it's cruel and unusual punishment.
Plus: Illegal homes in California, Erdogan's party does poorly in local elections, and more...
Philip Esformes was sentenced for charges on which a jury hung. After receiving a commutation, the federal government vowed to try to put him back in prison.
And a federal judge just said so.
Ralph Petty likely violated the Constitution. In a rare move, a federal court signaled this week that lawsuits against him may not be dead on arrival.
The judge found that Food Not Bombs' activity was clearly expressive conduct under the First Amendment.
Disney has vowed to appeal the ruling.
Priscilla Villarreal, also known as "Lagordiloca," has sparked a debate about free speech and who, exactly, is a journalist.
It's a frightening reminder of how far the government will go to get their way—and to warn tech companies against platforming speech it doesn't like.
Step 1: Become president. That's the hardest part.
"The First Amendment prevents DeSantis from identifying a reform prosecutor and then suspending him to garner political benefit," U.S. Circuit Judge Jill Pryor wrote.
Plus: Migrant shelter stabbing, Hollywood doom, Cuban spies, and more...
The state's law, which a federal judge enjoined last month, prohibits firearms in most public places.
New anti-drag laws were deemed unconstitutional in every state where they were challenged this year.
Stanford's Jay Bhattacharya debates St. John University's Kate Klonick on the federal government's role in social media censorship.
The district court just dismissed certain procedural objections to them, though it wasn't asked to consider the substantive arguments.
Judges can sentence defendants for charges they were acquitted of by a jury, a practice that troubles criminal justice advocates, civil liberties groups, and several Supreme Court justices.