Nobody Owes Trump Their Vote. Not Even Kyle Rittenhouse.
After announcing he would vote for Ron Paul, an onslaught of criticism ensued. Those critiques missed the mark, even though the gun rights advocate ultimately caved.
After announcing he would vote for Ron Paul, an onslaught of criticism ensued. Those critiques missed the mark, even though the gun rights advocate ultimately caved.
We're entering peak stupidity with "election interference" claims.
Those three presidential candidates are making promises that would have bewildered and horrified the Founding Fathers.
X's child porn detection system doesn’t violate an Illinois biometric privacy law, the judge ruled.
Officials suspend efforts to force X to suppress the world’s access to video of a crime.
Corey Harris' case should never have been a national news story to begin with.
Local hostility to free speech may become a global problem.
Argentine President Javier Milei and Tesla CEO Elon Musk met for the first time in Austin, Texas, where they "agreed on the need for free markets."
Fight back through better information and discourse, not by empowering the government.
If adopted by the Supreme Court, Prof. Candeub's approach would be a grave menace to freedom of speech.
The justices established guidelines for determining whether that is true in any particular case.
Even as they attack the Biden administration's crusade against "misinformation," Missouri and Louisiana defend legal restrictions on content moderation.
The First Amendment restricts governments, not private platforms, and respects editorial rights.
Supreme Court arguments about two social media laws highlight a dangerous conflation of state and private action.
"None of these laws prevent kids from viewing anything. They just prevent kids from posting," argues Shoshana Weissmann.
Plus: A listener asks if it should become the norm for all news outlets to require journalists to disclose their voting records.
Republicans and Democrats are using emotional manipulation to push an agenda of censorship.
Where are the misinformation czars and the mainstream media fact-checkers now?
In an era when X (formerly Twitter) is blamed for all the ills of the world, here's a case where it did good.
The former journalist defends misinformation in the Trump era and explains why so many journalists are against free speech.
Your support makes some of the "riskiest" journalism on the internet possible.
"Being a true free speech champion does require that you defend speech that even you disagree with," says libertarian Rikki Schlott.
The Supreme Court considers whether and when banishing irksome constituents violates the First Amendment.
Democrats and Republicans are united in thinking their political agendas trump the First Amendment.
The justices agreed to consider whether the Biden administration's efforts to suppress online "misinformation" were unconstitutional.
Even content creators outside of New York would feel its effects.
The worst of the antitrust alarmism keeps proving untrue, as tech companies believed by some to be monopolies instead lose market share.
We should all be skeptical that the same government that can't balance a budget can revamp the dominant form of modern communications and boost young people's self-esteem.
If Facebook et al. are pushing a "radical leftist narrative," why don’t they have a constitutional right to do that?
The worst of the antitrust alarmism keeps proving untrue, as tech companies believed by some to be monopolies instead lose market share.
Yoel Roth worries about government meddling in content moderation, except when Democrats target "misinformation."
The appeals court narrowed a preliminary injunction against such meddling but confirmed the threat that it poses to freedom of speech.
Plus: The doubling of the deficit, young Americans souring on college, and more...
The paper worries that "social media companies are receding from their role as watchdogs against political misinformation."
It's no mystery why the former president preferred a forum in which his record and positions would face no serious challenge.
Plaintiffs in Missouri v. Biden allege that federal pressure to remove and suppress COVID-19 material on Facebook and Twitter violates the First Amendment.
Join Reason on YouTube and Facebook on Thursday at 1:30 p.m. Eastern for a live discussion with Jay Bhattacharya and John Vecchione about their legal case against the Biden administration.
Plus: A warning about trigger warnings, Biden blocks uranium mining near Grand Canyon, and more...
The independent journalist talks about true press freedom, the Twitter Files, Russiagate, Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
The maverick journalist talks Twitter Files, the end of the anti-government left, Donald Trump, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Plus: Groups ask Supreme Court to say public officials can't block people, latest jobs report shows openings down, and more...
Many politicians offer a simplified view of the world—one in which government interventions are all benefits and no costs. That couldn't be further from the truth.
Unfortunately, there is reason to doubt that the judge's decision will meaningfully constrain the feds.
Plus: Teaching A.I. about the Fourth of July, and more...
Expect the very foundations of the internet to come under attack from politicians and the mainstream media.