Unlike Biden and Trump, Kamala Harris Has Repeatedly Supported Pot Legalization
The presumptive Democratic nominee has a more liberal drug policy record than both the president and the Republican presidential nominee.
The presumptive Democratic nominee has a more liberal drug policy record than both the president and the Republican presidential nominee.
There’s less reason to fight when one-size-fits-all policies are replaced with local diversity.
A federal judge rejected the government’s excuses for banning home production of liquor.
A potentially important post-NFIB enumerated powers challenge.
The "most pro-life president in American history" cannot please hardline activists without alienating voters.
Fifth in a series of guest-blogging posts.
Fourth in a series of guest-blogging posts.
Third in a seris of guest-blogging posts.
Second in a series of guest-blogging posts.
First in a series of guest-blogging posts.
The book argues that the structural elements of the Constitution should be interpreted in a way that empowers the federal government to address collective action problems facing the states.
Does the National Labor Relations Board have jurisdiction over a medical marijuana dispensary's treatment of its employees?
I cover both liberal immigration sanctuaries and conservative gun sanctuaries, and the more general principles behind them.
Rescheduling does not resolve the conflict between federal pot prohibition and state rejection of that policy.
Contrary to the president's rhetoric, moving marijuana to Schedule III will leave federal pot prohibition essentially unchanged.
The decision addresses an important issue left open by the Supreme Court's decision reversing Roe v. Wade.
No technology exists today to enable railroads to comply with the state's diktat, which villainizes a mode of transportation that is actually quite energy efficient.
Moving marijuana to Schedule III, as the DEA plans to do, leaves federal pot prohibition essentially untouched.
Plus: A listener asks the editors for examples of tasks the government does well (yikes).
A similar law in California had disastrous consequences.
His embrace of federalism is one of those rare instances when political expedience coincides with constitutional principles.
The former and would-be president is keen to avoid alienating voters who reject both kinds of extremism on the issue.
The president has not expunged marijuana records or decriminalized possession, which in any case would fall far short of the legalization that voters want.
Charlie Lynch’s ordeal is a vivid reminder of a senseless prohibition policy that persists thanks to political inertia.
Three justices who concurred in that judgment accuse the majority of trying to "insulate all alleged insurrectionists from future challenges" by going further than necessary.
The Beehive State joins a growing wave of defiance aimed at Washington, D.C.
The justices might well overrule the Colorado Supreme Court on the grounds that only Congress has power to enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. Such a ruling would be a serious mistake.
Perhaps Governor Abbott will flout a directive from the Supreme Court in a future case, but reports of Texas "defying" the Supreme Court are bunk, and many making such claims should know better.
The points about marijuana's risks and benefits that the department now concedes were clear long before last August.
It's part of the annual Frankel Lecture symposium in the Houston Law Review.
I focus on the Washington Supreme Court's flawed decision holding an eviction moratorium is not a taking of private property.
The book argues democracy can be preserved and improved by breaking up the United States into two or more new nations.
The late Supreme Court justice eloquently defended property rights and state autonomy.
She was the first woman Supreme Court justice, and played a key role in changing the Court's jurisprudence for the better on several issues.
The Cato Institute recently published the latest edition of its ranking of personal, economic, and overall freedom in the states.
This speech, which I gave at a Federalist Society conference, is now available in a written version on SSRN. It will be published by the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy.
The former president is right to worry that supporting restrictions on abortion could hurt him in the general election.
Some estimates suggest the number of abortions has even increased.
Conservative legal scholar William Hodes argues that federal restrictions on abortion are beyond the scope of Congressional power.
The furious response to a seemingly modest reform reflects a broader dispute about the role of courts in a democracy.
A new document with more than 80 signatories puts liberty, not government, at the heart of the conservative movement.
The Tyler home equity theft case is just the tip of a much larger iceberg of property rights issues where stronger judicial protection can protect the interests of the poor and minorities, as well as promote the federalist values of localism and diversity.
"If you don't trust central authority, then you should see this immediately as something that is very problematic," says the Florida governor.
The legislation would give property owners "sole discretion" in deciding how many parking spaces they want to build.
Plus: What the editors hate most about the IRS and tax day
Are political breakups really as American as apple pie?