Trump Promises To Get Rid of Bad Regulations. Can He Deliver?
Growth of regulation slowed under former President Trump, but it still increased.
Growth of regulation slowed under former President Trump, but it still increased.
The feds’ focus on large-scale crops hinders the resurgence of heritage grains and results in less food diversity.
Let's just call this what it is: another gimmick for Congress to escape its own budget limits and avoid having a conversation about tradeoffs.
Tariffs and sugar subsidies have propped up overvalued land needed to fix the environmental damage.
American grocery stores are an underrated symbol of free market abundance.
Plus: Home equity theft at the Supreme Court, New York shows how not to legalize marijuana, and more...
The massive piece of legislation embodies all that is wrong with American lawmaking.
Big corporations and entire industries constantly use their connections in Congress to get favors, no matter which party is in power.
Legislators will increasingly argue over how to spend a diminishing discretionary budget while overall spending simultaneously explodes.
The biggest beneficiaries of economic growth are poor people. But the deepest case for economic growth is a moral one.
With government meddling, many farmers end up doing less with more, and people end up paying more for less.
Asking America's agriculture industry to stand on its own two feet remains a third rail in American politics.
Here and abroad, laws and policies meant to protect sustainability aren't delivering and cost a fortune.
Corporate welfare hurts the people who actually need help.
"I don't understand why money is leaving my pocket and going into the pocket of somebody who is wealthy."
The government should let milk marketing stand on its own four legs.
Joe Biden’s choice for agriculture secretary is more of the same.
There's an easier way to lessen the impact of retaliatory agriculture tariffs: repeal our own
Trump's farm bailouts have cost taxpayers more than $28 billion already, and he just announced another $14 billion in payments as part of his reelection pitch to farm-heavy states.
Most of the money will go to the wealthiest agriculture businesses.
Instead of taking a little off the top, Trump needs to give farm subsidies a buzz cut.
The reform could help formalize immigrant farm labor.
Government has tilted the scales in milk's favor for so long that dairies forgot how to compete.
Trump has authorized up to $16 billion in bailout spending this year, on top of $12 billion spent in 2018.
This might seem like nothing more than a snooze-worthy debate over semantics or economic theory or government P.R. strategies. But it matters a lot.
While Trump prepares another round of aid payments for farmers, Marco Rubio is pushing for tariffs on Mexican fruits and vegetables that will send prices soaring.
Sugar subsidies are welfare for the rich. They cost consumers billions a year.
It would also legalize hemp, which is pretty cool.
More than 1,100 people living in America's 50 largest cities have received bailout funds intended for farmers harmed by Trump's trade war.
Just like the last one. And the one before that. And the one before that.
Farm subsidies are a menace, especially when they line the pockets of the wealthy.
The corporate welfare in the farm bill is likely to end up on President Donald Trump's desk anyway, even after a surprising defeat in the House.
The bill is full of handouts to wealthy businesses and other special interests.
Two new efforts in Washington seek to rein in the subsidies.
Most of the money has gone to a small collection of well-off farms.
Everybody realized it was about bringing in money, not improving public health.
The market can't fix the problem when government insists on intervention.
As the presidential race drags into the home stretch, food issues don't even rate as a blip on the polls.
Farmers are such a protected class that it's hard to take the notion of a war against them seriously.
Some things won't change no matter who wins the 2016 election.
Overproduce peanuts and depress peanut prices; don't pay your loans; and collect taxpayers' money.
Farm subsides, GMO responses, and regulatory overreach should prompt some discussion.
A trio of interesting stories aren't making national headlines.
Two recent examples illustrate deep and broad problems.
What the Liz Mair firing tells us about Scott Walker, GOP politics, and libertarianism