Unlike Biden and Trump, Kamala Harris Has Repeatedly Supported Pot Legalization
The presumptive Democratic nominee has a more liberal drug policy record than both the president and the Republican presidential nominee.
The presumptive Democratic nominee has a more liberal drug policy record than both the president and the Republican presidential nominee.
Plus: A listener asks the editors if employers should be held responsible for the speech and actions of employees outside of the workplace.
Voters should not dismiss the former president's utter disregard for the truth as a personal quirk or standard political practice.
After facing weeks of falling poll numbers and pressure from fellow Democrats and liberal donors, Biden ended his reelection campaign. He subsequently endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris.
Reason's Zach Weissmueller talked with Trump supporters at the Republican National Convention about heated rhetoric, the weaponization of government, and plans for unity.
There’s less reason to fight when one-size-fits-all policies are replaced with local diversity.
We need not conjure "extreme hypotheticals" to understand the danger posed by an "energetic executive" who feels free to flout the law.
I was one of the participants, along with many other legal scholars.
We've now had two consecutive presidential administrations deploy versions of this same argument in response to questions about the fitness of the man allegedly running the federal government.
The Supreme Court's flawed decision largely ignores text and original meaning, and fails to resolve crucial issues.
There is no textual basis for "immunity" as such, but there are structural reasons why some degree of insulation is inevitable.
A thoughtful, sober take on Trump v. United States.
Contrary to progressive criticism, curtailing bureaucratic power is not about protecting "the wealthy and powerful."
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson says these cases will "devastate" the regulatory state. Good.
By requiring "absolute" immunity for some "official acts" and "presumptive" immunity for others, the justices cast doubt on the viability of Donald Trump's election interference prosecution.
The Supreme Court's recent rulings limiting the powers of the administrative state are a blessing for liberals who might not control the White House for much longer.
It won't end the administrative state or even significantly reduce the amount of federal regulation. But it's still a valuable step towards protecting the rule of law and curbing executive power.
The Court says Chevron deference allows bureaucrats to usurp a judicial function, creating "an eternal fog of uncertainty" about what the law allows or requires.
The decision rejects a system in which the agency imposes civil penalties after investigating people and validating its own allegations.
The candidate who grasps the gravity of this situation and proposes concrete steps to address it will demonstrate the leadership our nation now desperately needs. The stakes couldn't be higher.
Both rulings were by Democratic-appointed judges - a result that bodes ill for the plan's future.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett's majority opinion includes significant errors, and violates some of her own precepts against excessive reliance on questionable history.
Chevron deference, a doctrine created by the Court in 1984, gives federal agencies wide latitude in interpreting the meaning of various laws. But the justices may overturn that.
The case hinged on the ATF’s statutory authority, not the Second Amendment.
It's a good policy, authorized by the law. But it will likely face lawsuits, nonetheless, potentially leading to a prolonged legal battle.
Issuing a posthumous pardon for Bennett would reaffirm our nation’s commitment to free expression and intellectual freedom.
The blanket pardon is one of the largest yet, and another sign of the collapse of public support for marijuana prohibition.
Six justices agreed that federal regulators had misconstrued the statutory definition of a machine gun.
The decision allows the lawsuit to proceed, albeit with fewer plaintiffs.
Fifth in a series of guest-blogging posts.
Fourth in a series of guest-blogging posts.
I cover both liberal immigration sanctuaries and conservative gun sanctuaries, and the more general principles behind them.
Plus: Who are the editors' favorite vice presidents of all time?
Rescheduling does not resolve the conflict between federal pot prohibition and state rejection of that policy.
The vice president's exaggeration reflects a pattern of dishonesty in the administration's pitch to voters who oppose the war on weed.
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott takes a tactic from the progressive prosecutors he says he opposes.
Contrary to the president's rhetoric, moving marijuana to Schedule III will leave federal pot prohibition essentially unchanged.
Will the real president of the United States during the years 2020 through 2022 please stand up?
Plus: Hunter's guns, AI replacing dating, East German cars, and more...
Moving marijuana to Schedule III, as the DEA plans to do, leaves federal pot prohibition essentially untouched.
Most of the justices seem skeptical of granting Donald Trump complete immunity from criminal prosecution for "official acts."
David Beito discusses his new book The New Deal’s War on the Bill of Rights: The Untold Story of FDR’s Concentration Camps, Censorship, and Mass Surveillance.
The Supreme Court will decide whether former presidents can avoid criminal prosecution by avoiding impeachment and removal.
From Alice Roosevelt to Hunter Biden, we've never been sure how to reconcile American democracy with American dynasties.
The modern presidency is a divider, not a uniter. It has become far too powerful to be anything else.
An interesting amicus brief urges the justices not to rely upon penumbras and emanations in construing the scope of Presidential immunity.
Joe Biden is the latest of a string of presidents to deny Congress its rightful role in war making.