'Too Much Law' Gives Prosecutors Enormous Power To Ruin People's Lives
In a new book, Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch describes the "human toll" of proliferating criminal penalties.
In a new book, Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch describes the "human toll" of proliferating criminal penalties.
Insofar as the justices split, it was due to long-standing disagreement over the nature of the Court's original jurisdiction.
When those on parole or probation are included, one out of every 47 adults is under “some form of correctional supervision.”
An attack on the independence of the federal judiciary.
The Supreme Court created, then gutted, a right to sue federal agents for civil rights violations.
The decision shows that the Supreme Court has forced judges who like gun control to respect the Second Amendment anyway.
The Supreme Court is not as “extreme” or divided as it may seem.
Libertarian legal giant Randy Barnett on his epic Supreme Court battles, the Federalist Society, and watching movies with Murray Rothbard.
His criticism of President Joe Biden’s proposed Supreme Court reform is hard to take seriously.
The Supreme Court's conservatives are not cutting conservative litigants any slack (and that's a good thing).
Plus: Venezuelan election follow-up, racial segregation is back (for Kamala), and more...
Plus: A listener asks the editors about Project 2025.
Antonin Scalia twice joined Supreme Court decisions rejecting bans on that particular form of political expression.
The proposals include term limits for Supreme Court justices, a binding ethics code, and a constitutional amendment limiting the president's' immunity from prosecution. All 3 are potentially good ideas. But devil is in details.
Thanks to C-Span, video is now available.
Joan Biskupic reports that the justices were initially inclined to back Idaho in the EMTALA case, until they realized the case was messier than they had thought.
Plus: Vance's anti-Trump emails, Venezuelan elections, toxic masculinity discourse, and more...
Chelsea Koetter is asking the Michigan Supreme Court to render the state's debt collection scheme unconstitutional.
Candid end of term comments from one of the Court's progressive justices.
Nordlinger's questions and my answers covered a wide range of topics on law, public policy, and more.
Vineyard owners face $120,000 in fines for letting an employee and his family live on their 60-acre property without a permit.
Defending the federal ban on gun possession by drug users, the government's lawyers seem increasingly desperate.
The proposals are likely to include term limits for Supreme Court justices, a binding ethics code, and a constitutional amendment limiting the president's and other officials' immunity from prosecution.
Wealth taxes discourage investment, shrink wages, and don’t generate much revenue.
We need not conjure "extreme hypotheticals" to understand the danger posed by an "energetic executive" who feels free to flout the law.
Plus: A listener asks whether Bruce Springsteen's song Born in the U.S.A is actually patriotic.
That some legal commentators are surprised by Justice Barrett may say more about Court commentary (and the way she was caricatured when nominated) than it does about Justice Barrett.
The decision to overturn Chevron removes an agency trump card, but does not instruct courts to ignore agency opinions--and they won't.
The 5th Circuit ruled that the agency violated the Administrative Procedure Act when it rejected applications from manufacturers of flavored nicotine e-liquids.
There is no textual basis for "immunity" as such, but there are structural reasons why some degree of insulation is inevitable.
A thoughtful, sober take on Trump v. United States.
And the Supreme Court agrees to weigh in.
Contrary to progressive criticism, curtailing bureaucratic power is not about protecting "the wealthy and powerful."
The doctrine makes it nearly impossible for victims of prosecutorial misconduct to get recourse.
Even as he praises judicial decisions that made room for "dissenters" and protected "robust political debate," Tim Wu pushes sweeping rationales for censorship.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson says these cases will "devastate" the regulatory state. Good.
“Immigration is an area of the law where the partisan alignments break down over Chevron.”
Plus: A disappointing first round of "Baby YIMBY" grant awards, President Joe Biden endorses rent control, and House Republicans propose cutting housing spending.
Plus: Trump immunity ruling, cosmopolitan thinking on immigration, cringe Kamala, and more...
By requiring "absolute" immunity for some "official acts" and "presumptive" immunity for others, the justices cast doubt on the viability of Donald Trump's election interference prosecution.
The Court is remanding these two cases for more analysis—but it made its views on some key issues clear.
Her concurrence is a reminder that the application of criminal law should not be infected by personal animus toward any given defendant.
The decision also negates two counts of the federal indictment accusing Donald Trump of illegally interfering in the 2020 presidential election.
Homeless advocates say the court's decision in Grants Pass v. Johnson gives local governments a blank check to "to arrest or fine those with no choice but to sleep outdoors."
The Court says Chevron deference allows bureaucrats to usurp a judicial function, creating "an eternal fog of uncertainty" about what the law allows or requires.