The NIH Deleted Comments Criticizing Animal Testing. A Federal Court Says That Violates the First Amendment.
The NIH had been deleting all social media comments containing words like animal, testing, and cruel.
The NIH had been deleting all social media comments containing words like animal, testing, and cruel.
"Evidently, one out of every two Americans wishes they had fewer civil liberties," said one researcher. "This is a dictator's fantasy."
According to disciplinary charges against Jennifer Kerkhoff Muyskens, she suppressed video evidence that would have helped DisruptJ20 defendants.
A new survey from the Knight Foundation found that more than 1 in 4 college students agreed schools should prohibit "speech they may find offensive or biased."
Antonin Scalia twice joined Supreme Court decisions rejecting bans on that particular form of political expression.
Only Sens. Paul and Wyden are expected to vote "no" on Tuesday. Power to stop KOSA now resides with the House.
Customs and Border Protection insists that it can search electronics without a warrant. A federal judge just said it can't.
"Now, people will say, 'Oh, it's unconstitutional.' Those are stupid people," the former president said.
The Kids Online Safety Act would have cataclysmic effects on free speech and privacy online.
Plus: Gainesville shrinks minimum lot sizes, a Colorado church can keep providing shelter to the homeless, and Berkeley considers allowing small apartments everywhere.
The Church of the Rock is suing, arguing that the zoning crackdown in Castle Rock violates the First Amendment.
However distasteful, the First Amendment protects a citizen’s right to give a police officer the middle finger.
In a "novel" order concerning the app NGL, the agency takes aim at online anonymity and at minors on social media.
Nearly eight years after it was filed, the vexatious lawsuit against protester DeRay Mckesson has been dismissed with prejudice.
After police detained Benjamin Hendren, they urged construction workers to lie about him.
The town of Lakeland will have to refund Julie Pereira $688 in fines and fees and pay her $1 in nominal damages for violating her First Amendment rights.
Plus: A listener asks whether Bruce Springsteen's song Born in the U.S.A is actually patriotic.
"Every teacher, every classroom in the state will have a Bible in the classroom and will be teaching from the Bible in the classroom," state Superintendent Ryan Walters announced last week.
Department of Education settlements with protest-wracked colleges threaten censorship by bureaucracy.
Supervised release shouldn't require former inmates to give up their First Amendment rights.
And the Supreme Court agrees to weigh in.
Even as he praises judicial decisions that made room for "dissenters" and protected "robust political debate," Tim Wu pushes sweeping rationales for censorship.
"This is an obvious attempt to use our public schools to convert kids to Christianity. We live in a democracy, not a theocracy," one ACLU attorney tells Reason.
The majority opinion makes clear that social media content moderation is an activity protected by the First Amendment. That likely dooms large parts of the state laws restricting content moderation.
The Court is remanding these two cases for more analysis—but it made its views on some key issues clear.
Although the FBI never produced evidence that Ali Hemani was a threat to national security, it seems determined to imprison him by any means necessary.
The standing requirements laid down by the majority might make it extremely difficult or impossible for victims of indirect goverment censorship to get their cases to court.
The verdict in Murthy v. Missouri is a big, flashing green light that jawboning may resume.
Murthy v. Missouri challenges government efforts to suppress dissenting viewpoints on social media.
"It’s not like public health is infallible," the Stanford professor and Great Barrington Declaration author tells Reason's Nick Gillespie.
The justices ruled that "objective evidence" of retaliation does not require "very specific comparator evidence."
Numerous federal appeals courts have ruled that filming police is protected under the First Amendment, but police continue to illegally arrest people for it.
Plus: unpermitted ADUs in San Jose, Sen. J.D. Vance's mass deportation plan for housing affordability, and the California Coastal Commission's anti-housing record.
Phoenix police are trained that "deescalation" means overwhelming and immediate force, whether or not it's necessary.
This isn't the first time a student event has been canceled over alleged safety issues.
The court ruled that it is unconstitutional for officials to remove library books with the "intent to deprive patrons of access to ideas with which they disagree."
The plaintiffs hope to "help Republicans and conservatives see why this ban is inconsistent with the free speech values they say they care about."
A new law will make it much harder to film law enforcement officers in their public duties. Does that violate the First Amendment?
The transit authority was sued after rejecting an ad that directed viewers to go to a website "to find out about the faith of our founders."
Students have a constitutional right to refuse to say the Pledge of Allegiance, no matter what school officials think.
Chief executives' illicit motives can render their subordinates' actions unconstitutional. There is good reason for courts to enforce that rule.
The ACLU, another polarizing organization, was willing to defend the NRA in court. That should tell you that some things aren't partisan.
An ideologically diverse mix of individuals and organizations supports a Texas journalist who was arrested for asking questions.
Justin Pulliam's arrest and lawsuit once again demand we ask if "real" journalists are entitled to a different set of rights.
Don’t unleash censors; restrain them more!
Eric Levitz argues that the left should take a stand against censorship—for practical rather than principled reasons.